Home/Supreme Court/Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Peck

Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Peck

347 U.S. 984, 74 S. Ct. 853
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1954·No. No. 714·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph S. Gill, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Peck, 347 U.S. 984, 74 S. Ct. 853 (1954).

347 U.S. 984 (Geo. F. Alger Co. v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Judybill Osceola Enrolled Member of the Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida and All Others Similarly Situated v. Florida Department of Revenue
893 F.2d 1231 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Capitol Industries-Emi, Inc. v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually, and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California, Emi Limited v. William M. Bennett, Kenneth Cory, Richard Silberman, Individually and Asmembers Of, and Martin Huff, Individually and as Executive Officer Of, Thefranchise Tax Board, State of California
681 F.2d 1107 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. Bennett
681 F.2d 1107 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Livingston
179 F. Supp. 9 (E.D. South Carolina, 1959)