Gentry v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gentry v. Warden

326 A.2d 127, 167 Conn. 660

DecidedOctober 3, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 326 A.2d 127 (Gentry v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gentry v. Warden, 326 A.2d 127, 167 Conn. 660 (Colo. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County to dismiss is denied and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to permit it to entertain a request from the plaintiff to make application to have the parole board named as an additional defendant.

Abbot B. Schwebel, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Maxwell Heiman, special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued October 3 decided October 3, 1974

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County to dismiss is denied and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to permit it to entertain a request from the plaintiff to make application to have the parole board named as an additional defendant.

Abbot B. Schwebel, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Maxwell Heiman, special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued October 3 decided October 3, 1974

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

326 A.2d 127, 167 Conn. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-warden-conn-1974.