Gentry v. Warden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gentry v. Warden

326 A.2d 127, 167 Conn. 660

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gentry v. Warden. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 Conn. 639 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 3, 1974·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County to dismiss is denied and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to permit it to entertain a request from the plaintiff to make application to have the parole board named as an additional defendant.

Abbot B. Schwebel, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Maxwell Heiman, special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued October 3 decided October 3, 1974

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County to dismiss is denied and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to permit it to entertain a request from the plaintiff to make application to have the parole board named as an additional defendant.

Abbot B. Schwebel, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Maxwell Heiman, special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff). Argued October 3 decided October 3, 1974

Gentry v. Warden, 326 A.2d 127, 167 Conn. 660 (Colo. 1974).

Pincite

326 A.2d 127 (Gentry v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.