Gentry v. State

286 S.W. 1103, 105 Tex. Crim. 96, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 430
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 1926
DocketNo. 10001.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 S.W. 1103 (Gentry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gentry v. State, 286 S.W. 1103, 105 Tex. Crim. 96, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 430 (Tex. 1926).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction in District Court of Hopkins County of unlawfully transporting, intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant pleaded guilty. In such cases the statute requires .that evidence shall be introduced. While there is no statement of facts in the case, we must presume the regularity of the procedure in the absence of a showing to the contrary. The only complaint is of argument of the District Attorney. Nothing in the bill of exceptions makes evident to us the fact that there was no testimony before the court to which the argument could be related. In the absence of some such showing in the bill we are compelled to accord to the action of the learned trial court regularity, and that in his opinion the argument was pertinent and proper and called for by the evidence.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oliver v. State
236 S.W.2d 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 S.W. 1103, 105 Tex. Crim. 96, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.