Gentry v. State

169 S.W. 663, 74 Tex. Crim. 663, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 397
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 26, 1914·No. No. 3202.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of simple assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $5.

The term of court at which appellant was tried adjourned May 2d, and the statement of facts nor bills of exceptions were neither filed within the time allowed, having been filed more than twenty days after adjournment, consequently the motion of the Assistant Attorney General to strike out the bills of exception and statement of facts must be sustained. DeFriend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222; Stephens v. State, 158 S. W. Rep., 531; Wilson v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 547, 160 S. W. Rep., 454; Hampton v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 189, 161 S. W. Rep., 966; Newsome v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 453, 162 S. W. Rep., 891, and other cases cited in those opinions.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of. exception there is no question presented we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gentry v. State, 169 S.W. 663, 74 Tex. Crim. 663, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 397 (Tex. 1914).

169 S.W. 663 (Gentry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
160 S.W. 454 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Stephens v. State
158 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Durham and Harris v. State
155 S.W. 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Hampton v. State
161 S.W. 965 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
De Friend v. State
153 S.W. 881 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Newsome v. State
162 S.W. 891 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hampton v. State
161 S.W. 966 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)