Gentry v. State

923 N.E.2d 620, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1520
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 24, 2010
Docket2010-0096
StatusPublished

This text of 923 N.E.2d 620 (Gentry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gentry v. State, 923 N.E.2d 620, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1520 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-081311. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, and VIII; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., also voted to accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V.

Motion for stay of jurisdictional consideration denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bodyke, H-07-040 (12-5-2008)
2008 Ohio 6387 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 N.E.2d 620, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-state-ohio-2010.