Gentry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Gentry v. State

864 S.W.2d 870, 315 Ark. 281, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 659

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 6, 1993

DocketCR 93-1199

StatusPublished

This text of 864 S.W.2d 870 (Gentry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gentry v. State, 864 S.W.2d 870, 315 Ark. 281, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 659 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Ralph Gentry, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, C.P. Christian, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Ralph Gentry, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, C.P. Christian, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

864 S.W.2d 870, 315 Ark. 281, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-state-ark-1993.