Gentry v. Garnard
This text of Gentry v. Garnard (Gentry v. Garnard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MARGARET WEIDOW GENTRY, BOBBIE GENTRY, LESLIE WEIDOW, EDWARD WEIDOW, ASHLEY WEIDOW, and TAYLOR WEIDOW, Plaintiffs, v. CIV 18-1207 KG/CG GLEN GARNAND, CHRISTINA GARNAND, LARRY G. BLANK and BEVERLY BLANK Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------- GLEN GARNAND, Third-Party Plaintiff v. LARRY G. BLANK and BEVERLY BLANK, Third-Party Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------ STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. LARRY G. BLANK, BEVERLY BLANK, GLEN GARNAND, CHRISTINA GARNAND, MARGARET WEIDOW GENTRY, BOBBIE GENTRY, LESLIE WEIDOW, EDWARD WEIDOW, ASHLEY WEIDOW AND TAYLOR WEIDOW, Intervenor-Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------- LARRY G. BLANK and BEVERLY BLANK, Counterclaimants on Complaint in Intervention, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY Defendant on Counterclaim.
ORDER OF REFERENCE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants Blank’s Third, Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Affirmative Defenses for Failure to Compy with Mandatory Disclosures Under Rule 26 (Doc. 63); and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enlargement of Time for Plaintiffs to File Amendments to Pleadings and Join Additional Parties (Doc. 64). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed dispositio wees Mngein UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gentry v. Garnard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-garnard-nmd-2020.