Gentry v. Consolidated Credit Corp.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment granted on motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on his complaint, which sought to recover a money judgment on a promissory note. In defendant’s answer, the primary defense was that the purported sale contract was given to secure a usurious loan. The prayers were that the note and purported conditional sale [460] contract be annulled and canceled.
No basis exists for this court’s jurisdiction. (Const. Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV; Code Ann. §2-3704). Simpson v. McMillan, 150 Ga. 119 (102 SE 825); Jones v. Van Vleck, 224 Ga. 796 (164 SE2d 724); Clark v. Liberty Loan Corp., 223 Ga. 351 (155 SE2d 19); s. c., 116 Ga. App. 213 (156 SE2d 535).
This case is
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
181 S.E.2d 388 (Gentry v. Consolidated Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.