Gentry v. Consolidated Credit Corp.
This text of 181 S.E.2d 388 (Gentry v. Consolidated Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment granted on motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on his complaint, which sought to recover a money judgment on a promissory note. In defendant’s answer, the primary defense was that the purported sale contract was given to secure a usurious loan. The prayers were that the note and purported conditional sale [460]*460contract be annulled and canceled.
No basis exists for this court’s jurisdiction. (Const. Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV; Code Ann. §2-3704). Simpson v. McMillan, 150 Ga. 119 (102 SE 825); Jones v. Van Vleck, 224 Ga. 796 (164 SE2d 724); Clark v. Liberty Loan Corp., 223 Ga. 351 (155 SE2d 19); s. c., 116 Ga. App. 213 (156 SE2d 535).
This case is
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 S.E.2d 388, 227 Ga. 459, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentry-v-consolidated-credit-corp-ga-1971.