Gentone Enterprises, Inc. v. Scop
This text of 537 So. 2d 629 (Gentone Enterprises, Inc. v. Scop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment for damages and the post-judgment order on attorney’s fees and costs. Because the action below was a contract action based upon a liquidated amount, appellee was entitled to prejudgment interest. Accordingly, on the issue presented on cross appeal relating to the trial court’s failure to award prejudgment interest, we reverse. See generally Shakeshober v. Florida Resort Development Corporation, 492 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 504 So.2d 768 (Fla.1987); Law v. Blue Lagoon-Pompano, Inc., 470 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 So. 2d 629, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5706, 1988 WL 137887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentone-enterprises-inc-v-scop-fladistctapp-1988.