Gentles v. Holder
This text of 594 F. App'x 154 (Gentles v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenneth Leopold Gentles, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s order denying a continuance. We deny the petition for review.
We conclude that the denial of the motion for a continuance was not an abuse of discretion. Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007); Onyeme v. INS, [155]*155146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir.1998). We also conclude that the Board correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider issues related to the denial of the 1-360 petitions and that Gentles was removable as charged.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentles-v-holder-ca4-2015.