Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
This text of Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. De Martini & Yi, LLP (Bryan Visnius, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carolyn E. Wade, J.), entered June 17, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).
There is no merit to the arguments raised by plaintiff with respect to the sufficiency of defendant's proof that the EUO scheduling letters and denial of claim forms had been timely and properly mailed (see generally St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 08, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentlecare-ambulatory-anesthesia-servs-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-nyappterm-2017.