Gentile-Youd v. Guardianship of Rudnick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gentile-Youd v. Guardianship of Rudnick

632 So. 2d 88, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 294, 1994 WL 19169

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 1994

DocketNo. 92-2468

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 632 So. 2d 88 (Gentile-Youd v. Guardianship of Rudnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gentile-Youd v. Guardianship of Rudnick, 632 So. 2d 88, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 294, 1994 WL 19169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jane Gentile-Youd appeals from an order of the trial court appointing Perry Rudnick as Plenary Guardian of the Person of Harriet Rudnick. We affirm.

“This court will not disturb the trial court’s findings, which are presumed correct, unless they are totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence.” Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also Randy Int'l Ltd. v. American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Because there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Perry Rudnick is best suited to be his wife’s guardian, we affirm the order appointing him as Plenary Guardian of the Person.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jane Gentile-Youd appeals from an order of the trial court appointing Perry Rudnick as Plenary Guardian of the Person of Harriet Rudnick. We affirm.

“This court will not disturb the trial court’s findings, which are presumed correct, unless they are totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence.” Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also Randy Int'l Ltd. v. American Excess Corp., 501 So.2d 667, 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Because there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Perry Rudnick is best suited to be his wife’s guardian, we affirm the order appointing him as Plenary Guardian of the Person.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 So. 2d 88, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 294, 1994 WL 19169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentile-youd-v-guardianship-of-rudnick-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack