Gentile v. New York City Railway Co.

92 N.Y.S. 264
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 23, 1905·Published

Opinions

McCALL, J.

We fail to find in this record the slightest proof to support the claim or allegation of negligence on the part of the defendant, unless we are willing to assume that the mere happening of the accident implies negligence. The burden that the law imposes upon the plaintiff of sustaining by a preponderance of credible proof plaintiff’s assertion of negligence on the part of defendant, and of likewise proving himself free from contributory negligence, he has, in so far as we read this rec[265]*265ord, utterly failed to sustain, and the judgment rendered herein cannot, therefore, be upheld, and must be reversed, with costs.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

SCOTT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gentile v. New York City Railway Co., 92 N.Y.S. 264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 264 (Gentile v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lofsten v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
97 A.D. 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)