Gentile v. Lesk
This text of 270 A.D.2d 306 (Gentile v. Lesk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered April 15, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We reject the plaintiffs’ contentions that the jury verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence as a matter of law, or that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 306, 705 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentile-v-lesk-nyappdiv-2000.