Gentile v. Hildman
This text of 2 A.D.2d 871 (Gentile v. Hildman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact as to negligence and contributory negligence. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, in a negligence action.) Present—MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 871, 156 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentile-v-hildman-nyappdiv-1956.