Gentile v. Gentile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gentile v. Gentile

19 A.D.2d 825, 243 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 825 (Gentile v. Gentile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gentile v. Gentile, 19 A.D.2d 825, 243 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on August 16, 1963, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony and counsel fee, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of reducing the counsel fee to the sum of $1,000, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award of $1,750 in our opinion was excessive. This case should be -brought to trial -by defendant without further delay. The best protection to both parties against any unfairness in the fixing of temporary alimony on the basis of affidavits is a speedy trial rather than an appeal. (Bleiman v. Bleiman, 272 App. Div. 760.) (Weisner v. Weisner, 19 A D 2d 788; Rosen v. Rosen, 4 A D 2d 756; Yudell v. Yudell, 282 App. Div. 649; Amos v. Amos, 282 App. Div. 692; Tee v. Ghay, 277 App. Div. 782.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on August 16, 1963, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony and counsel fee, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of reducing the counsel fee to the sum of $1,000, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award of $1,750 in our opinion was excessive. This case should be -brought to trial -by defendant without further delay. The best protection to both parties against any unfairness in the fixing of temporary alimony on the basis of affidavits is a speedy trial rather than an appeal. (Bleiman v. Bleiman, 272 App. Div. 760.) (Weisner v. Weisner, 19 A D 2d 788; Rosen v. Rosen, 4 A D 2d 756; Yudell v. Yudell, 282 App. Div. 649; Amos v. Amos, 282 App. Div. 692; Tee v. Ghay, 277 App. Div. 782.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 825, 243 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentile-v-gentile-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack