Gentile v. Austin
166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 21, 1964
DocketNo. 64-104
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 166 So. 2d 155 (Gentile v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gentile v. Austin, 166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
Opinion
The directed verdict in favor of the defendant entered at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case is affirmed under the rule stated in Zubowicz v. Warnock, Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 890, to the effect that appellant, being the occupant of the premises, was in as good or better position to know of such defect as was appellee. See also Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami v. George Const. Corp.
166 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentile-v-austin-fladistctapp-1964.