Gentile v. Austin
166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939
Opinion
The directed verdict in favor of the defendant entered at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case is affirmed under the rule stated in Zubowicz v. Warnock, Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 890, to the effect that appellant, being the occupant of the premises, was in as good or better position to know of such defect as was appellee. See also Felshin v. Sir, 149 Fla. 218, 5 So.2d 600.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gentile v. Austin, 166 So. 2d 155, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
166 So. 2d 155 (Gentile v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami v. George Const. Corp.
166 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)