Gentex Corporation v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board
995 A.2d 874, 606 Pa. 115, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1201
This text of 995 A.2d 874 (Gentex Corporation v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gentex Corporation v. Workers'compensation Appeal Board, 995 A.2d 874, 606 Pa. 115, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1201 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
*116 ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
What constitutes sufficient notice, including how specific the description of the injury must be, under Section 312 of the Workers’ Compensation Act. 77 P.S. § 632. In addressing this issue, the parties are also to address if, and when, the burden shifts to the employer to conduct a reasonable investigation into the circumstances surrounding the injury.
The Petition for Entry of Supersedeas is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
995 A.2d 874, 606 Pa. 115, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gentex-corporation-v-workerscompensation-appeal-board-pa-2010.