Genteman v. Genteman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Genteman v. Genteman

260 A.D. 949, 24 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 949 (Genteman v. Genteman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genteman v. Genteman, 260 A.D. 949, 24 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order requiring plaintiff to serve amended complaint wherein she shall separately state and number the allegations constituting a cause of action for dissolution of a corporation and for restitution by individual officers and directors for waste and mismanagement, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon and upon payment of said costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order requiring plaintiff to serve amended complaint wherein she shall separately state and number the allegations constituting a cause of action for dissolution of a corporation and for restitution by individual officers and directors for waste and mismanagement, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from the entry of the order hereon and upon payment of said costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 949, 24 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genteman-v-genteman-nyappdiv-1940.