Gensley v. Eberlin
This text of 852 N.E.2d 1207 (Gensley v. Eberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file a return of writ within three days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within three days after the return is filed. Respondent shall provide a copy of the return to the petitioner on the same date that the return is filed. Petitioner’s physical presence before the court is not required.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
852 N.E.2d 1207, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gensley-v-eberlin-ohio-2006.