Gens v. Hamilton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Gens v. Hamilton

123 N.Y.S. 981

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 981 (Gens v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gens v. Hamilton, 123 N.Y.S. 981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought against the maker and indorsers of four promissory notes, alleged to be due and unpaid. The notes were offered in evidence, and are marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1 to 4, respectively. There was no evidence of protest. Respondent claims that- the notices of protest were pinned to the exhibits when offered. These notices are not marked in evidence.

Consequently, in the condition of the record before us, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought against the maker and indorsers of four promissory notes, alleged to be due and unpaid. The notes were offered in evidence, and are marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1 to 4, respectively. There was no evidence of protest. Respondent claims that- the notices of protest were pinned to the exhibits when offered. These notices are not marked in evidence.

Consequently, in the condition of the record before us, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gens-v-hamilton-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack