Genrry Alberto Contreras Rangel v. Facility Administrator, Diamondback Correctional Facility

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided July 27, 2026·No. 5:26-cv-01565·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

GENRRY ALBERTO ) CONTRERAS RANGEL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-26-1565-SLP ) FACILITY ADMNISTRATOR, ) DIAMONDBACK ) CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ) ) Respondent. )

O R D E R

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9] (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell entered July 2, 2026. Judge Mitchell advised Petitioner of his right to object to the R&R and directed any objections be filed on or before July 23, 2026. Judge Mitchell further advised Petitioner that any failure to object would waive Petitioner’s right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the R&R. Petitioner has neither filed an objection nor sought an extension of time in which to do so. Therefore, the Court finds that Petitioner has waived further review of all issues addressed in the R&R. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9] is ADOPTED in its entirety and Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to Preserve the Automatic Stay of Removal and Prevent Transfer is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27" day of July, 2026.

SCOTT L. PALK CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Genrry Alberto Contreras Rangel v. Facility Administrator, Diamondback Correctional Facility, (W.D. Okla. 2026).

Genrry Alberto Contreras Rangel v. Facility Administrator, Diamondback Correctional Facility (Genrry Alberto Contreras Rangel v. Facility Administrator, Diamondback Correctional Facility) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casanova v. Ulibarri
595 F.3d 1120 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)