Genrich v. Medford Fur Foods, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Genrich v. Medford Fur Foods, Inc.

90 N.W.2d 109, 4 Wis. 2d 103, 1958 Wisc. LEXIS 377

DecidedMay 6, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.W.2d 109 (Genrich v. Medford Fur Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genrich v. Medford Fur Foods, Inc., 90 N.W.2d 109, 4 Wis. 2d 103, 1958 Wisc. LEXIS 377 (Wis. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Brown, J.

The facts set out in the pleadings regarding the sale of adulterated and poisonous mink feed, damage to plaintiffs who fed the feed to their mink, and an agreement between buyers and seller that the former would use the [104]*104feed at their own risk and save the seller harmless from the consequences of such feeding are the same as those in Metz v. Medford Fur Foods, ante., p. 96, 90 N. W. (2d) 106. As in that action and for the reasons given in the opinion there, we hold that the demurrer to the defense based on the agreement should have been sustained.

By the Court. — Order reversed, and cause remanded with directions to sustain plaintiffs’ demurrer and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Hallows, J., took no part.

Broadfoot and Wingert, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown, J.

The facts set out in the pleadings regarding the sale of adulterated and poisonous mink feed, damage to plaintiffs who fed the feed to their mink, and an agreement between buyers and seller that the former would use the [104]*104feed at their own risk and save the seller harmless from the consequences of such feeding are the same as those in Metz v. Medford Fur Foods, ante., p. 96, 90 N. W. (2d) 106. As in that action and for the reasons given in the opinion there, we hold that the demurrer to the defense based on the agreement should have been sustained.

By the Court. — Order reversed, and cause remanded with directions to sustain plaintiffs’ demurrer and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Hallows, J., took no part.

Broadfoot and Wingert, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.W.2d 109, 4 Wis. 2d 103, 1958 Wisc. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genrich-v-medford-fur-foods-inc-wis-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack