Genovese v. Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Genovese v. Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corp.

255 A.D. 1031, 8 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 1031 (Genovese v. Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genovese v. Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corp., 255 A.D. 1031, 8 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments in favor of defendants Wolf and Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corporation affirmed, with costs. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: On conflicting evidence the jury found in favor of the plaintiff against certain defendants and against plaintiff in favor of certain other defendants. Upon examination of the record we find that the verdict is sufficiently supported by the proofs, and is not against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (One judgment is in favor of plaintiff, two judgments are in favor of the defendants Wolf and Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corporation, and the [1032]*1032order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments in favor of defendants Wolf and Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corporation affirmed, with costs. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: On conflicting evidence the jury found in favor of the plaintiff against certain defendants and against plaintiff in favor of certain other defendants. Upon examination of the record we find that the verdict is sufficiently supported by the proofs, and is not against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (One judgment is in favor of plaintiff, two judgments are in favor of the defendants Wolf and Buffalo Plate & Window Glass Corporation, and the [1032]*1032order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 1031, 8 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genovese-v-buffalo-plate-window-glass-corp-nyappdiv-1938.