Gennaro v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gennaro v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.

3 A.D.2d 722, 160 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 722 (Gennaro v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gennaro v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co., 3 A.D.2d 722, 160 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, an order dated October 24, 1956 denied respondent’s motion to vacate an order of preclusion, unless respondent, within 10 days thereafter, serve a further bill of particulars in full compliance with the order of preclusion, in which event the motion was to be granted. The order dated October 24, 1956 also granted appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint unless respondent so serve such further bill of particulars, in which event appellant’s motion was to be denied. The appeal is from so much of the order dated October 24, 1956 as conditionally denies respondent’s motion and conditionally grants appellant’s motion. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, an order dated October 24, 1956 denied respondent’s motion to vacate an order of preclusion, unless respondent, within 10 days thereafter, serve a further bill of particulars in full compliance with the order of preclusion, in which event the motion was to be granted. The order dated October 24, 1956 also granted appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint unless respondent so serve such further bill of particulars, in which event appellant’s motion was to be denied. The appeal is from so much of the order dated October 24, 1956 as conditionally denies respondent’s motion and conditionally grants appellant’s motion. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 722, 160 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gennaro-v-standard-fruit-steamship-co-nyappdiv-1957.