Genin v. Genin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Genin v. Genin

31 A.D.2d 915, 299 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 915 (Genin v. Genin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genin v. Genin, 31 A.D.2d 915, 299 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Family -Court, entered June 28, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to delete the provisions therein for weekly deposit of sums into savings accounts for each child on her 21st birthday, and order otherwise affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Provisions of this nature are not authorized by the Family Court Act and, furthermore, the sums which were also provided to he paid weekly by the respondent-appellant for the support of his children are adequate to meet their present needs. The record supports such allowances. Finally, with reference to the .counsel fee we note that services have been rendered in connection with this appeal and, on that basis, we have concluded that the allowance may stand. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Family -Court, entered June 28, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to delete the provisions therein for weekly deposit of sums into savings accounts for each child on her 21st birthday, and order otherwise affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Provisions of this nature are not authorized by the Family Court Act and, furthermore, the sums which were also provided to he paid weekly by the respondent-appellant for the support of his children are adequate to meet their present needs. The record supports such allowances. Finally, with reference to the .counsel fee we note that services have been rendered in connection with this appeal and, on that basis, we have concluded that the allowance may stand. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 915, 299 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genin-v-genin-nyappdiv-1969.