Gengler v. Hooper

154 N.E. 450, 324 Ill. 47
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 23, 1926
DocketNo. 17717. Reversed and remanded.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 154 N.E. 450 (Gengler v. Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gengler v. Hooper, 154 N.E. 450, 324 Ill. 47 (Ill. 1926).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellees filed their bill of complaint in chancery in the circuit court of Cook county alleging that they were the owners of certain real estate in that county, praying that a bailiff’s deed issued to Bertha F. Hooper, and a quit-claim deed from her to James H. Hooper, be set aside and canceled. Answers were filed thereto, and upon a hearing a decree was entered setting aside the deeds in accordance with the prayer of the bill. The record is now before this court upon appeal.

No findings of fact were made by the court in the decree, and the transcript of the record of the circuit court does not show that the evidence was preserved by a certificate of evidence or report of a master in chancery, nor is it supported by a verdict of a jury. Appellant assigns as error the entry of a decree for affirmative relief not based upon any findings of fact contained therein or upon evidence properly preserved.

In chancery it is incumbent upon the party in whose favor a decree granting relief is entered, to preserve in the record the evidence justifying the decree. The general finding that all the material allegations in the bill are proved and that the equities of the case are with the complainant will not sustain a decree granting relief where there is no finding of specific facts and the evidence is not preserved in the record by a certificate of evidence, the report of a master in chancery finding the facts, or the verdict of a jury. Ohman v. Ohman, 233 Ill. 632; VanMeter v. Malchef, 276 id. 451; Akin v. Akin, 268 id. 324.

The decree of the circuit court must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Molner v. Cartenos
112 N.E.2d 470 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1953)
Quigley v. Quigley
268 Ill. App. 130 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
Vette v. Brown
166 N.E. 52 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1929)
Franco-American Hygienic Co. v. City of Chicago
161 N.E. 63 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1928)
Benton State Bank v. Bennett
247 Ill. App. 252 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 N.E. 450, 324 Ill. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gengler-v-hooper-ill-1926.