Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc.

27 Misc. 2d 325, 207 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2777

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 Misc. 2d 325 (Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genevose v. Wheatality Bakery, Inc., 27 Misc. 2d 325, 207 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the action is pending in New York State, the forum chosen by the plaintiff, it was improvident exercise of discretion to direct his physical examination by a Connecticut physician. The examination should be made by a physician licensed in New York who is subject to the jurisdiction of the City Court of the City of New York, so that he will be available to testify at the trial if need be. Such physician shall be either the physician already designated by the defendant or such other physician as the court below may in its discretion appoint. The examination shall proceed at such time and place as may be agreed upon by the parties, or in the event of their inability to agree, at such time and place, including Bridgeport, as the court below may in its discretion direct.

The order so far as appealed from should be modified, without costs, and motion remitted to the court below for further disposition in accordance with the foregoing.

Concur—Steuer, J. P., Hoestadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since the action is pending in New York State, the forum chosen by the plaintiff, it was improvident exercise of discretion to direct his physical examination by a Connecticut physician. The examination should be made by a physician licensed in New York who is subject to the jurisdiction of the City Court of the City of New York, so that he will be available to testify at the trial if need be. Such physician shall be either the physician already designated by the defendant or such other physician as the court below may in its discretion appoint. The examination shall proceed at such time and place as may be agreed upon by the parties, or in the event of their inability to agree, at such time and place, including Bridgeport, as the court below may in its discretion direct.

The order so far as appealed from should be modified, without costs, and motion remitted to the court below for further disposition in accordance with the foregoing.

Concur—Steuer, J. P., Hoestadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 2d 325, 207 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genevose-v-wheatality-bakery-inc-nyappterm-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack