Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

29 Jones & S. 332, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 291

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court at special term had power to order restitution (Wright v. Nostrand, 100 N. Y., 616; Carleton v. The Mayor, 19 Weekly Digest, 354), and as the method adopted to enforce it carried out the necessary effect of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and rendered it effectual, there is no necessity for condemning it by a reversal.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, etc.