Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co.

Superior Court of New York

Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co.

19 N.Y.S. 1021

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJuly 5, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 19 N.Y.S. 1021 (Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co., 19 N.Y.S. 1021 (superctny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court at special term had power to order restitution, ( Wright v. Nostrand, 100 N. Y. 616, 3 N. E. Rep. 78; Carleton v. Mayor, 19 Wkly. Dig. 354;) and as the method adopted to enforce it carried out the necessary effect of the judgment of the court of appeals, and rendered it effectual, there is no necessity for condemning it by a reversal.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court at special term had power to order restitution, ( Wright v. Nostrand, 100 N. Y. 616, 3 N. E. Rep. 78; Carleton v. Mayor, 19 Wkly. Dig. 354;) and as the method adopted to enforce it carried out the necessary effect of the judgment of the court of appeals, and rendered it effectual, there is no necessity for condemning it by a reversal.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 N.Y.S. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genet-v-president-of-the-delaware-h-canal-co-superctny-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack