Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co.
19 N.Y.S. 1021
Opinion
The court at special term had power to order restitution, ( Wright v. Nostrand, 100 N. Y. 616, 3 N. E. Rep. 78; Carleton v. Mayor, 19 Wkly. Dig. 354;) and as the method adopted to enforce it carried out the necessary effect of the judgment of the court of appeals, and rendered it effectual, there is no necessity for condemning it by a reversal.
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co., 19 N.Y.S. 1021 (superctny 1892).
19 N.Y.S. 1021 (Genet v. President of the Delaware & H. Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. . Nostrand
3 N.E. 78 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)