General Railway Signal Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
411 N.E.2d 792, 51 N.Y.2d 763, 432 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2620
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Prohibition does not lie (Matter of Tessy Plastics Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights, 47 NY2d 789, 791; see Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816, 818).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
General Railway Signal Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 411 N.E.2d 792, 51 N.Y.2d 763, 432 N.Y.S.2d 373, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2620 (N.Y. 1980).
411 N.E.2d 792 (General Railway Signal Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Elizabeth Hospital v. Kramarsky
81 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)