General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2013
Docket12-2390
StatusUnpublished

This text of General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc. (General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc., (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2390

GENERAL MOTORS LLC,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BILL KELLEY, INC., d/b/a Kelley Motors, Inc.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00051-JPB)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 13, 2013

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Edward Brown, Steven Andrew Stonestreet, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffrey J. Jones, JONES DAY, Columbus, Ohio; Peter G. Zurbuch, BUSCH, ZURBUCH & THOMPSON, PLLC, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bill Kelley, Inc. (“Kelley”) appeals the district

court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of General

Motors LLC (“GM”), in GM’s suit seeking to enforce its

settlement agreement between the parties. On appeal, Kelley

alleges that the settlement was in violation of West Virginia

statutory law. See West Virginia Code Ann. § 17A-6A-1 et seq.

(LexisNexis 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc.,

No. 2:12-cv-00051-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 17A-6A-1
Virginia § 17A-6A-1
§ 17A-6A-1
West Virginia § 17A-6A-1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
General Motors LLC v. Bill Kelley, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-llc-v-bill-kelley-inc-ca4-2013.