General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Third Circuit

General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

150 F.2d 201, 16 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 917, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3295

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1945

Docket8814

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 150 F.2d 201 (General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 150 F.2d 201, 16 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 917, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3295 (3d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

' The record discloses substantial evidencé in support of the findings of the National Labor Relations Board in this case. The order of the Board, however, under the particular facts here present, is too broad. There is no finding by the Board that the unfair labor practices engaged in by the petitioner have been so persistent and varied as to justify the entry of a blanket order to cease and desist from all violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., nor is there any indication from the testimony to that effect. The inclusion of Paragraph 1(c) in the order is therefore unwarranted and should be stricken out. N. L. R. B. v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 262, 137 A.L.R. 849, certiorari denied, 314 U.S. 693, 62 S.Ct. 363, 86 L.Ed. 554; N. L. R. B. v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 61 S.Ct. 693, 85 L.Ed. 930. The Board’s order is modified in accordance with this opinion. In all other respects the order is approved and a decree of enforcement will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

' The record discloses substantial evidencé in support of the findings of the National Labor Relations Board in this case. The order of the Board, however, under the particular facts here present, is too broad. There is no finding by the Board that the unfair labor practices engaged in by the petitioner have been so persistent and varied as to justify the entry of a blanket order to cease and desist from all violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., nor is there any indication from the testimony to that effect. The inclusion of Paragraph 1(c) in the order is therefore unwarranted and should be stricken out. N. L. R. B. v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 262, 137 A.L.R. 849, certiorari denied, 314 U.S. 693, 62 S.Ct. 363, 86 L.Ed. 554; N. L. R. B. v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 61 S.Ct. 693, 85 L.Ed. 930. The Board’s order is modified in accordance with this opinion. In all other respects the order is approved and a decree of enforcement will be entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 F.2d 201, 16 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 917, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corporation-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca3-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack