General Motors Corporation and bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc v. Michael Maldonado, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Juan MacIas Hernandez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2005
Docket13-03-00705-CV
StatusPublished

This text of General Motors Corporation and bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc v. Michael Maldonado, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Juan MacIas Hernandez (General Motors Corporation and bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc v. Michael Maldonado, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Juan MacIas Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Motors Corporation and bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc v. Michael Maldonado, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Juan MacIas Hernandez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-705-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________


GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND

BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC,   Appellants,


v.


MICHAEL MALDONADO, AS INDEPENDENT

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JUAN

MACIAS HERNANDEZ,                                                       Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 39383-2. After the record and briefs were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a final settlement agreement in this case. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day of March, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
General Motors Corporation and bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc v. Michael Maldonado, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Juan MacIas Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corporation-and-bridgestonefirestone-north-american-tire-texapp-2005.