General Motors Corp. v. Romine
416 So. 2d 2, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20135
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 1982
DocketNo. 80-1273, 80-1295
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 416 So. 2d 2 (General Motors Corp. v. Romine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
General Motors Corp. v. Romine, 416 So. 2d 2, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20135 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
Opinion
The defendant’s failure to timely and properly object: to the introduction of plaintiffs’ expert; to the use of a special interrogatory verdict form; and to the inconsistent verdict returned by the jury precludes appellate review of these matters. Consequently, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Muss v. Blake
416 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
416 So. 2d 2, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corp-v-romine-fladistctapp-1982.