General Motors Corp. v. Koenigsberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

General Motors Corp. v. Koenigsberg

560 So. 2d 803, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2189, 1990 WL 37505

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1174

StatusPublished

This text of 560 So. 2d 803 (General Motors Corp. v. Koenigsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Motors Corp. v. Koenigsberg, 560 So. 2d 803, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2189, 1990 WL 37505 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to set aside a default on the issue of liability, nor in the subsequent denial of a motion for rehearing.

The trial court found appellant had failed to demonstrate excusable neglect. We find no showing of a gross abuse of discretion by the trial court and therefore affirm.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to set aside a default on the issue of liability, nor in the subsequent denial of a motion for rehearing.

The trial court found appellant had failed to demonstrate excusable neglect. We find no showing of a gross abuse of discretion by the trial court and therefore affirm.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., dissents without opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 So. 2d 803, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2189, 1990 WL 37505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corp-v-koenigsberg-fladistctapp-1990.