General Motors Corp. v. Edwards

District Court of Appeal of Florida

General Motors Corp. v. Edwards

314 So. 2d 242, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13742

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 1975

DocketNo. 74-388

StatusPublished

This text of 314 So. 2d 242 (General Motors Corp. v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Motors Corp. v. Edwards, 314 So. 2d 242, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13742 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after an examination of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. In particular, we are of the view that as a matter of law defendant was not entitled to an instruction on intervening cause. See Rawls v. Ziegler, Fla.1958, 107 So.2d 601; De La Concha v. Pinero, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 25; 23 Fla.Jur., Negligence, sec. 34; Miami Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Mahlo, Fla. 1950, 45 So.2d 119; Cone v. Inter County Telphone & Telegraph Co., Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 148; Courtney v. American Oil Company, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 675. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

CROSS, MAGER, and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after an examination of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. In particular, we are of the view that as a matter of law defendant was not entitled to an instruction on intervening cause. See Rawls v. Ziegler, Fla.1958, 107 So.2d 601; De La Concha v. Pinero, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 25; 23 Fla.Jur., Negligence, sec. 34; Miami Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Mahlo, Fla. 1950, 45 So.2d 119; Cone v. Inter County Telphone & Telegraph Co., Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 148; Courtney v. American Oil Company, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 675. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

CROSS, MAGER, and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 So. 2d 242, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corp-v-edwards-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack