General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Marshall
This text of 444 S.W.2d 910 (General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A motion to appeal was sustained in this proceeding wherein judgment for $1200 went against the appellant.
We invoke against the appellee the penalties prescribed by RCA 1.260(c) for his failure to file a brief. It is noted that an extension of time for filing of appellee’s brief was granted, but no brief was filed within the time as extended.
RCA 1.260(c) provides:
“If the appellee fails to file his brief within the time allowed, the Court may:
(1) Accept the appellant’s statement of the facts and issues as correct; or (2) reverse the judgment if appellant’s brief reasonably appears to sustain such action ; or (3) regard the appellee’s failure as a confession of error and reverse the judgment without considering the merits of the case.”
The appellant’s brief reasonably appears to sustain its prayer for reversal.
The judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment n. o. v. for the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 S.W.2d 910, 1969 Ky. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-acceptance-corp-v-marshall-kyctapp-1969.