General Mills, Inc. v. McGriff

Supreme Court of Florida

General Mills, Inc. v. McGriff

212 So. 2d 7, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2153

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 1968

DocketNo. 36583

StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 2d 7 (General Mills, Inc. v. McGriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Mills, Inc. v. McGriff, 212 So. 2d 7, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2153 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as there is no utterance by the District Court of Appeal which can be considered to conflict with any expression of this Court or any District Court of Appeal on the subject, we now decide that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued, so it is discharged.

THOMAS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., agrees only to discharge of writ. CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, J., dissent.

See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Oates,, 141 Fla. 164, 192 So. 637 (1939); Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc., 177 So.2d 221 (Fla.1965).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as there is no utterance by the District Court of Appeal which can be considered to conflict with any expression of this Court or any District Court of Appeal on the subject, we now decide that the writ of certiorari was improvidently issued, so it is discharged.

THOMAS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., agrees only to discharge of writ. CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, J., dissent.

See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Oates,, 141 Fla. 164, 192 So. 637 (1939); Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc., 177 So.2d 221 (Fla.1965).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 So. 2d 7, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-mills-inc-v-mcgriff-fla-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack