General Iron Corp. v. Livingston
4 A.D.2d 959, 168 N.Y.S.2d 470, 41 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2147, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1957·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order granting respondent’s motion to restrain the picketing of its premises pendente lite and denying appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Metzger Co. v. Fay, 4 A D 2d 436.) Palermo v. Motto (283 App. Div. 746), relied on by appellants, is readily distinguishable on its facts. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [8 Misc 2d 538.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
General Iron Corp. v. Livingston, 4 A.D.2d 959, 168 N.Y.S.2d 470, 41 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2147, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
4 A.D.2d 959 (General Iron Corp. v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palermo v. Motto
283 A.D. 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
General Iron Corp. v. Livingston
8 Misc. 2d 538 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)