General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 532, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1247
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 N.Y. 133 →
Opinion
Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Hogan, J., in General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. (235 N. Y. 133).
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 139 N.E. 723, 235 N.Y. 532, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1247 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 723 (General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
139 N.E. 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)