GENERAL IMPACT GLASS & WINDOWS, CORP. v. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2021·No. 21-0047·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 24, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-47 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-209 AP; 12-28206 CC ________________

General Impact Glass & Windows, Corp., Appellant,

vs.

The Hanover Insurance Company, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert T. Watson, Judge.

Daniels, Rodriguez, Berkeley, Daniels & Cruz, P.A., and Jorge L. Cruz, Justin S. Miller and William O. Diab, for appellant.

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Christopher M. Horton and Brian A. Wolf (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee, The Hanover Insurance Company.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. A trial court’s determination that the party with the burden of proof

has failed to meet that burden will not be overturned on appeal where it is

supported by competent, substantial evidence. See, e.g., Tylinski v. Klein

Auto., Inc., 90 So. 3d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GENERAL IMPACT GLASS & WINDOWS, CORP. v. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

GENERAL IMPACT GLASS & WINDOWS, CORP. v. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY (GENERAL IMPACT GLASS & WINDOWS, CORP. v. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tylinski v. Klein Automotive, Inc.
90 So. 3d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)