General Fireproof Door Corp. v. Tirem Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

General Fireproof Door Corp. v. Tirem Construction Corp.

51 A.D.2d 761, 379 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 761 (General Fireproof Door Corp. v. Tirem Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Fireproof Door Corp. v. Tirem Construction Corp., 51 A.D.2d 761, 379 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action on a promissory note in which plaintiff moved for summary judgment in lieu of the service of a complaint, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 15, 1975, as, upon reargument, (a) granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (b) denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) the judgment entered thereon on April 28, 1975. Judgment and order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly granted summary judgment. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Christ, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on a promissory note in which plaintiff moved for summary judgment in lieu of the service of a complaint, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 15, 1975, as, upon reargument, (a) granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (b) denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) the judgment entered thereon on April 28, 1975. Judgment and order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term properly granted summary judgment. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Christ, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 761, 379 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-fireproof-door-corp-v-tirem-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1976.