General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Magee Carpet Works
49 A. 366, 199 Pa. 647, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 673
Opinion
The conclusion arrived at in this case is that no sufficient cause appears for reversing the judgment. It is not clear that any error was committed by the court in its charge to the jury or in its answers to the defendant’s points. The specifications of error are therefore dismissed and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Magee Carpet Works, 49 A. 366, 199 Pa. 647, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 673 (Pa. 1901).
49 A. 366 (General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Magee Carpet Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Philadelphia Gas Range Co. v. Shallcross
20 Pa. D. & C. 118 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Clayton v. Lienhard
167 A. 321 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Grant v. St. James Mining Co.
191 P. 359 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1920)
Noll v. Cumberland Plateau Railroad
112 Tenn. 140 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)