General Electric Credit Corp. v. Beyerlein

30 A.D.2d 762, 292 N.Y.S.2d 32, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 898, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3680
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1968·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum : Since the personal property in question is not consumer goods, the reliance of the court below on Quality Finance Co. v. Hurley (337 Mass. 150) as creating an exception to section 9-206 of the Massachusetts Uniform Commercial Code was mistaken. In this case, however, where the lessor assigned the lease soon after its execution before delivery or installation of the goods and before beginning to perform its other obligations under the lease, a question to be resolved at trial exists whether the contract provision in the lease of personal property which purports to exempt the lessor’s assignee “for any of lessor’s obligations ” relates to the exemption from lessee’s defenses under section 9-206 or whether it relates to other duties to be performed by the lessor under the contract. (Noblett v. General Elec. Credit Corp. 400 P. 2d 442.) There are also questions of fact which should be determined on a trial as to whether appellant took the assignment in good faith and without notice of defenses. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying motion for summary judgment.) Present— Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Witmer and Henry, JJ. [55 Misc 2d 724.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

General Electric Credit Corp. v. Beyerlein, 30 A.D.2d 762, 292 N.Y.S.2d 32, 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 898, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 762 (General Electric Credit Corp. v. Beyerlein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chemical Bank v. Rinden Professional Ass'n
498 A.2d 706 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1985)