General Electric Co. v. Sonosite, Inc.
This text of 370 F. App'x 88 (General Electric Co. v. Sonosite, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This case was submitted, following oral argument, on July 7, 2009. On October 30, 2009, defendant-cross-appellant SonoSite, Inc., advised us that the parties have settled their dispute in this case. SonoSite moved to remand the case to the district court to permit consideration of an unopposed motion to vacate the Rule 54(b) judgment of the district court. SonoSite advised us that the plaintiffs-appellants do not oppose the motion.
In light of the settlement of the dispute, we conclude that the proper course of action is to dismiss the appeal without re[89]*89manding the case to the district court or otherwise indicating to the district court what action it should take on SonoSite’s request that the district court’s judgment be vacated. The parties remain free, of course, to move in the district court to vacate the judgment or for any other relief they wish to seek from that court.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. SonoSite’s motion is otherwise DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 F. App'x 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-electric-co-v-sonosite-inc-cafc-2009.