General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Tenn. LEXIS 342
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 1998·No. 01S01-9707-FD-00148·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

FOR PUBLICATION

Filed: September 21, 1998

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ) United States District Court ) Western District of Tennessee PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, ) Eastern Division ) No. 1-96-1172 v. ) ) Hon. James D. Todd PROCESS CONTROL COMPANY, ) United States District Judge ) DEFENDANT/PETITIONER. ) No. 01S01-9707-FD-00148

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING FILED September 21, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk Process Control Company, Defendant/Petitioner, has filed a petition to

rehear this cause pursuant to Tenn. R. App. R. 39 contending that our opinion

overlooks a material fact.

After due consideration, we conclude that the petition for rehearing should

be and the same is hereby denied at the cost of Defendant/Petitioner.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co., (Tenn. 1998).

General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co. (General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.