General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. v. Van Helden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. v. Van Helden

260 A.D.2d 347, 686 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 347 (General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. v. Van Helden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. v. Van Helden, 260 A.D.2d 347, 686 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant third-party plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated March 2, 1998, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant Henry J. Bosio pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that since no privity existed between the third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant, the third-party complaint failed to state a cause of action. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant third-party plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated March 2, 1998, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant Henry J. Bosio pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that since no privity existed between the third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant, the third-party complaint failed to state a cause of action. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 347, 686 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-electric-capital-auto-lease-inc-v-van-helden-nyappdiv-1999.