General Credit Corp. v. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford

Missouri Court of Appeals

General Credit Corp. v. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford

163 S.W.2d 99, 236 Mo. App. 937, 1942 Mo. App. LEXIS 174

DecidedJune 15, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.W.2d 99 (General Credit Corp. v. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Credit Corp. v. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford, 163 S.W.2d 99, 236 Mo. App. 937, 1942 Mo. App. LEXIS 174 (Mo. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

CAVE, J.

— This matter is before us on respondent’s motion to set aside the order of dismissal of appeal heretofore made, and to affirm the judgment. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in Sellers v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, No. 20183, which has been disposed of at this term, and we will not *938 again recite tbe facts or the reasons for holding that the order of dismissal should be set aside and for naught held and that respondent’s motion to affirm the judgment should be sustained. For the facts and reasons for the order herein made, we refer to the Sellers case, swpra. For the reasons given in such case, the order heretofore made in Vacation, dismissing appellant’s appeal, is set aside and for naught held and respondent’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court of Atchison County be and is hereby sustained. It follows said judgment must be and is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAVE, J.

— This matter is before us on respondent’s motion to set aside the order of dismissal of appeal heretofore made, and to affirm the judgment. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in Sellers v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, No. 20183, which has been disposed of at this term, and we will not *938 again recite tbe facts or the reasons for holding that the order of dismissal should be set aside and for naught held and that respondent’s motion to affirm the judgment should be sustained. For the facts and reasons for the order herein made, we refer to the Sellers case, swpra. For the reasons given in such case, the order heretofore made in Vacation, dismissing appellant’s appeal, is set aside and for naught held and respondent’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court of Atchison County be and is hereby sustained. It follows said judgment must be and is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.W.2d 99, 236 Mo. App. 937, 1942 Mo. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-credit-corp-v-national-fire-insurance-co-of-hartford-moctapp-1942.