General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Fifth Circuit

General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

152 F.2d 655

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1945·No. No. 11408·Published

Opinion

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are fully set out in the opinion of the lower Court in 59 F. Supp. 357, as well as the reasons of the District Judge for dismissing the complaint.

We agree with the lower Court that the Murray-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A., Sec, 606b — 3 (a), merely authorized, but did not require, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to make loans and purchases of rationed commodities.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are fully set out in the opinion of the lower Court in 59 F. Supp. 357, as well as the reasons of the District Judge for dismissing the complaint.

We agree with the lower Court that the Murray-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A., Sec, 606b — 3 (a), merely authorized, but did not require, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to make loans and purchases of rationed commodities.

The judgment is affirmed.

General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 152 F.2d 655 (5th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

152 F.2d 655 (General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related