General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Fifth Circuit

General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

152 F.2d 655

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1945

DocketNo. 11408

StatusPublished

This text of 152 F.2d 655 (General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

General Cooling & Heating Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 152 F.2d 655 (5th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are fully set out in the opinion of the lower Court in 59 F. Supp. 357, as well as the reasons of the District Judge for dismissing the complaint.

We agree with the lower Court that the Murray-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A., Sec, 606b — 3 (a), merely authorized, but did not require, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to make loans and purchases of rationed commodities.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are fully set out in the opinion of the lower Court in 59 F. Supp. 357, as well as the reasons of the District Judge for dismissing the complaint.

We agree with the lower Court that the Murray-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A., Sec, 606b — 3 (a), merely authorized, but did not require, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to make loans and purchases of rationed commodities.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 F.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-cooling-heating-corp-v-reconstruction-finance-corp-ca5-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack